Response to Quatro and Childs

  • Steven L. Rundle

Abstract

In his response to my essay, Quatro expresses deep misgivings not only about BAM, but also about Social Entrepreneurship and even for-profit higher education. Indeed, his concerns extend to any business activity that trespasses other divinely appointed “spheres” of God’s activity, to use Abraham Kuyper’s language. His complaint is that by encouraging businesses to have goals that are more appropriately the responsibility of the “organized church,” advocates of BAM are violating God’s sovereign intent for business, and reinforcing the very sacred-secular dichotomy that they claim to oppose.
Section
Articles